<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Hate Software Excuses (And You Should Too)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetestingblog.com/2010/01/11/i-hate-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2010/01/11/i-hate-software/</link>
	<description>Why, testing, of course!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Brown</title>
		<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2010/01/11/i-hate-software/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetestingblog.com/?p=362#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, jstrazzere; good view point on the situation.  This blog won&#039;t be much fun if we all agreed and didn&#039;t debate.  Would it?

Thank you so much for taking the time to comment.  As the author, I really appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, jstrazzere; good view point on the situation.  This blog won&#8217;t be much fun if we all agreed and didn&#8217;t debate.  Would it?</p>
<p>Thank you so much for taking the time to comment.  As the author, I really appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstrazzere</title>
		<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2010/01/11/i-hate-software/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>jstrazzere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetestingblog.com/?p=362#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I can&#039;t agree.

I hate software excuses, too.  But I blame the people and their processes.  You excuse them and blame the sofware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I can&#8217;t agree.</p>
<p>I hate software excuses, too.  But I blame the people and their processes.  You excuse them and blame the sofware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Brown</title>
		<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2010/01/11/i-hate-software/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetestingblog.com/?p=362#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Clearly...nothing!  If the lady pulled a key off the shelf that went to the door and gave it to me, it would have just worked.  Instead she had to grab a fob, program it.  The programming process was convoluted and clearly didn&#039;t work that well.  That&#039;s a software problem.  It could be a process problem too, but I think the people did everything they were suppose to do (according to the process).  They definitely weren&#039;t stupid or incompetent or lazy (except for maybe our office admin).

It&#039;s a possible scenario that the first time I get a physical key, and it doesn&#039;t work.  But chances are if it doesn&#039;t work, it&#039;s the wrong key.  It&#039;s not usual that it&#039;s the right key, and it doesn&#039;t work.  

Have you ever lent a physical key to a friend or neighbor to water your plants while you&#039;re on vacation, and it just didn&#039;t work?  Come on!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly&#8230;nothing!  If the lady pulled a key off the shelf that went to the door and gave it to me, it would have just worked.  Instead she had to grab a fob, program it.  The programming process was convoluted and clearly didn&#8217;t work that well.  That&#8217;s a software problem.  It could be a process problem too, but I think the people did everything they were suppose to do (according to the process).  They definitely weren&#8217;t stupid or incompetent or lazy (except for maybe our office admin).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a possible scenario that the first time I get a physical key, and it doesn&#8217;t work.  But chances are if it doesn&#8217;t work, it&#8217;s the wrong key.  It&#8217;s not usual that it&#8217;s the right key, and it doesn&#8217;t work.  </p>
<p>Have you ever lent a physical key to a friend or neighbor to water your plants while you&#8217;re on vacation, and it just didn&#8217;t work?  Come on!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstrazzere</title>
		<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2010/01/11/i-hate-software/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>jstrazzere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetestingblog.com/?p=362#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Clearly this is not a software problem - it&#039;s a people and process problem.

If the door were locked by a physical key, but the processes were the same, you would have the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly this is not a software problem &#8211; it&#8217;s a people and process problem.</p>
<p>If the door were locked by a physical key, but the processes were the same, you would have the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
