<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zombie Testing!!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetestingblog.com/2009/09/25/zombie-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2009/09/25/zombie-testing/</link>
	<description>Why, testing, of course!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon "The Sensai" Turner</title>
		<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2009/09/25/zombie-testing/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shannon "The Sensai" Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetestingblog.com/?p=265#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This ROCKS!!!! And the automated test is the jackhammer of testing tools. It&#039;s big, it&#039;s fast, and it&#039;s messy. I prefer a vampire tester over a zombie tester. The vampire tester does everything possible to suck the bugs out of the code.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ROCKS!!!! And the automated test is the jackhammer of testing tools. It&#8217;s big, it&#8217;s fast, and it&#8217;s messy. I prefer a vampire tester over a zombie tester. The vampire tester does everything possible to suck the bugs out of the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marisa Seal</title>
		<link>http://thetestingblog.com/2009/09/25/zombie-testing/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marisa Seal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetestingblog.com/?p=265#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Daniel,

I liked it. I think that testers need to be keeping up with the latest techniques, technology, etc. just as much as developers. I also agree that it&#039;s easy for testers to fall back on process and documentation since that is typically part of a QA/tester&#039;s job.

The only statement in the blog with which I took issue was &quot;Zombie testers will continue to look for bugs using the same heuristics, and they will continue to believe that they are being effective.&quot;

I think I understand what you are saying - that those who continue to rely on the same heuristics without even considering other methodologies/techniques may be zombified. But I think that heuristics are &quot;heuristics&quot; for a reason - they&#039;re reliable. Some &quot;famous&quot; testers even provide lists/mugs/etc. with common heuristics on them for handy reference. So I don&#039;t think reliance on &quot;the same old&quot; heuristics is a bad thing in and of itself; only if the person is not opening their eyes to other methodologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Daniel,</p>
<p>I liked it. I think that testers need to be keeping up with the latest techniques, technology, etc. just as much as developers. I also agree that it&#8217;s easy for testers to fall back on process and documentation since that is typically part of a QA/tester&#8217;s job.</p>
<p>The only statement in the blog with which I took issue was &#8220;Zombie testers will continue to look for bugs using the same heuristics, and they will continue to believe that they are being effective.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think I understand what you are saying &#8211; that those who continue to rely on the same heuristics without even considering other methodologies/techniques may be zombified. But I think that heuristics are &#8220;heuristics&#8221; for a reason &#8211; they&#8217;re reliable. Some &#8220;famous&#8221; testers even provide lists/mugs/etc. with common heuristics on them for handy reference. So I don&#8217;t think reliance on &#8220;the same old&#8221; heuristics is a bad thing in and of itself; only if the person is not opening their eyes to other methodologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

